Purpose

I will try my best to provide detailed info on various cars and what is like to live with them, I have already produced a few for Jaguar-car-forums, I will do my best to be unbiased, but it will be hard for some cars. I will re-produce press releases and copy from other motoring news.
Showing posts with label ignition switch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ignition switch. Show all posts

Saturday, 24 October 2015

USA RECALL - MAZDA - 1.2 million cars recalled for possible issues with the Ignition switch.

Mazda Motor Corporation will conduct a Safety and Emission Recall Campaign for certain models that have a quality and performance issue leading to the potential failure of the electrical thermal base of the ignition switch.  
The electrical thermal base is the specific part of the component that may fail.

Once the vehicle is running, this situation does not directly affect vehicle drivability or operation, or the operation of any safety devices or features in the vehicle.  As a result, there have been no reports of accidents or injuries related to this issue.
Due to an excessive amount of grease at the contact points inside the ignition switch during production, as a result of time and use, the grease may carbonize and accumulate between the contact points, reducing the electrical insulation performance inside the switch. As a result, continuous use may lead the contact points of the thermal base of the switch to become conductive, which may overheat the switch.  Should this occur, the resulting effect is smoke from the switch, and, in the worst case, a fire.
Approximately 1.2 million vehicles in the U.S. are affected.
Affected models are:
  • 1990-1996 323/Protégé
  • 1989-1998 MPV
  • 1993-1998 626
  • 1993-1995 929
  • 1993-1997 MX-6
  • 1992-1993 MX-3
Mazda plans to conduct this recall in the U.S. in December 2015.

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

General Motors Ignition Switch death claims extended by another seven sad victims.

General Motors’ ignition-switch compensation fund approved another seven death claims associated with ignition switch defects in its cars in the past week, bringing the total to 97 deaths, the office administering GM’s compensation fund said.
GM originally said it knew of only 13 deaths linked to the defect.

The office of attorney Kenneth Feinberg, who is overseeing victim compensation on the automaker’s behalf, also approved 16 more injury claims, raising the total to 179 approved injury claims as of May 1.
Of the 179 approved injury claims, 12 are for serious injuries resulting in quadriplegia, paraplegia, double amputation, permanent brain damage or pervasive burn. The other 167 claims are for less serious injuries requiring hospitalization or outpatient medical treatment within 48 hours of the accident.
The deadline for victims to file claims was Jan. 31.
After GM recalled 2.6 million vehicles with faulty ignition switches last year, the automaker hired Feinberg to administer the victims compensate program.
The defective switches can move from the “run” position, which cuts power to the power steering, brakes and airbags. 

A person seeking compensation must prove that the airbag did not deploy, and must show the defective switch was the primary cause of the crash.
Through Friday, GM had received 474 claims for deaths, 289 claims for catastrophic injuries and 3,579 claims for injuries requiring hospitalization. Feinberg’s office is still reviewing another 669 claims.
Hannah Lutz
Nora Naughton 

Sunday, 14 September 2014

USA RECALL #8 - GM recalls 200,000+ Saturn Vue models for ignition issues.

SUMMARY:
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2002-2004 Saturn Vue vehicles manufactured September 11, 2001, to April 6, 2004. In the affected vehicles, it may be possible for the key to be removed from the ignition when the ignition is not in the "Off" position.
CONSEQUENCE:
If the key can be removed from the ignition when the ignition is not in the "off" position, the vehicle could roll away: (a) for an automatic transmission, if the transmission is not in the "Park" position; or (b) for a manual transmission, if the parking brake is not engaged and the transmission is not in the "Reverse" position. This potential for rollaway increases the risk for a crash and occupant or pedestrian injuries.
REMEDY:
GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicle to see if the key can be pulled out when the ignition is off. If it can, dealers will replace the ignition cylinder and keys, free of charge. The manufacturer has not yet provided a notification schedule. Owners may contact Saturn customer service at 1-800-553-6000. GM's number for this recall is 14506. Note: Until a vehicle has been remedied, owners and operators are advised that when exiting, to be sure that the vehicle is in "Park," or in the case of a manual transmission, that the vehicle is in the "Reverse" position and the parking brake is engaged.
NOTES:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.


Sunday, 10 August 2014

USA - RECALL - Volkswagen recalls certain 2009MY Routans for Ignition switch issues.

Volkswagen considers the safety and satisfaction of its consumers and passengers a top priority. As such, Volkswagen of America today notified the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that it will be issuing a voluntary safety recall affecting the ignition switch on certain 2009 model year Volkswagen Routan vehicles.
The recall affects approximately 18,500 model year 2009 Volkswagen Routan vehicles. An engine shutoff can occur if a vehicle is started and the key fob is released and springs back to the intended “on” position but over-travels and hangs up between the “on” and “ACC” detents. Harsh roadway conditions or driver interaction with the key fob can cause the key fob to move to either the “on” or “ACC” detent position. Movement to the “ACC” detent position will shut down engine power.
To fix the issue, Volkswagen will install a WIN Module Detent Ring on all affected vehicles.


No accidents or injuries related to this issue have been reported.  Volkswagen will notify all owners of affected vehicles and will instruct them to arrange for an appointment with an authorized Volkswagen dealer.


Friday, 25 July 2014

USA - General motors profits down on Ignition Switch costs.

  • EBIT-adjusted of $1.4 billion, after $1.2 billion in recall-related costs and $0.2 billion in restructuring costs
  • Company records strong core operating performance in the second quarter 
  • Special charge of $0.4 billion for GM ignition switch compensation program 
General Motors Co. (NYSE: GM) today announced second quarter net income attributable to common stockholders of $0.2 billion, or $0.11 per diluted share. Strong core operating performance during the quarter was offset by a pre-tax net loss from special items of $1.3 billion, or $(0.47) per diluted share, and costs of $1.2 billion pre-tax primarily for recall-related repairs, or $(0.44) per diluted share.
"Our underlying business performance in the first half of the year was strong as we grew our revenue on improved pricing and solid new vehicle launches," said GM CEO Mary Barra. "We remain focused on keeping our customers at the center of all we do, and executing our plan to operate profitably in every region of the world." 

In the second quarter of 2013, GM’s net income attributable to common stockholders was $1.2 billion, or $0.75 per diluted share, which included a net loss from special items that reduced net income by $0.2 billion, or $(0.09) per diluted share.
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) adjusted was $1.4 billion and included the impact of $1.2 billion in recall-related costs and $0.2 billion in restructuring costs. This compares to the second quarter of 2013, when the company recorded EBIT-adjusted of $2.3 billion, which included a charge of $0.2 billion for recalls and $0.1 billion in restructuring costs.
Net revenue in the second quarter of 2014 was $39.6 billion, compared to $39.1 billion in the second quarter of 2013. In the first six months of 2014, revenue rose to $77 billion, up from $76 billion in the same period a year ago.
GM Results Overview (in billions except for per share amounts)
 Q2 2014Q2 2013
Revenue $39.6$39.1
Net income attributable to common stockholders $0.2$1.2
Earnings per share (EPS) diluted$0.11$0.75
Impact of special items on EPS diluted$(0.47)$(0.09)
   
EBIT-adjusted  $1.4$2.3
   
Automotive net cash flow from operating activities$3.6$4.5
Adjusted automotive free cash flow$1.9$2.6

Segment Results
  • GM North America reported EBIT-adjusted of $1.4 billion which included the impact of $1.0 billion in recall-related costs in the quarter. This compared with EBIT-adjusted of $2.0 billion in the second quarter of 2013, which included the impact of $0.1 billion in recall-related costs in the quarter.
  • GM Europe reported an EBIT-adjusted of $(0.3) billion, which includes $0.2 billion for restructuring costs. This compares with $(0.1) billion of EBIT-adjusted in the second quarter of 2013.  
  • GM International Operations reported EBIT-adjusted of $0.3 billion, compared to $0.2 billion in the second quarter of 2013. 
  • GM South America reported EBIT-adjusted of $(0.1) billion, compared with EBIT-adjusted of $0.1 billion in the second quarter of 2013.  
  • GM Financial earnings before tax was $0.3 billion for the quarter, compared to $0.3 billion in the second quarter of 2013. 
Special Items
A special charge of $0.4 billion was taken for the GM ignition switch compensation program. There is no cap on this program, but this charge is the company’s best estimate of the amounts that may be paid to claimants. Due to the unique nature of the program, this estimate contains significant uncertainty and it is possible the total cost could increase by approximately $0.2 billion.
As previously disclosed, going forward the company expects recall expense to normalize to a slightly higher rate than it experienced prior to this year, but not materially. The company is changing how it estimates future recall expense and will now accrue at the time of vehicle sale an amount that represents management’s best estimate of future recall costs in North America. As a consequence of this change, GM is taking a $0.9 billion non-cash pre-tax special charge in the second quarter for the estimated costs of future possible recalls for up to the next 10 years on 30 million GM vehicles on the road today.  
Cash Flow and Liquidity
For the quarter, automotive cash flow from operating activities was $3.6 billion and automotive free cash flow adjusted was $1.9 billion. GM ended the quarter with very strong total automotive liquidity of $38.8 billion.  Automotive cash and marketable securities was $28.4 billion compared with $27.0 billion for the first quarter of 2014.
“With successful new vehicle launches, we continue to generate strong results in the U.S. and China and remain on track to be profitable in Europe by mid-decade,” said Chuck Stevens, GM executive vice president and chief financial officer. “We are confident we are currently on or ahead of plan to deliver the results we promised earlier this year, excluding the effects of recalls.”

Monday, 23 June 2014

Now it seems like Chrysler has caught the GM Ignition bug with over 1.2 million cars being investigated.

Just as General Motors announces a new ignition switch recall this week, it looks like Chrysler Group may be heading down the same path. The government has opened two investigations into Chrysler, Jeep, and Dodge vehicles after consumers complained of ignition switch problems. An investigation is one step in a process that may or may not lead to vehicle recalls. 

The first probe involves 525,000 2006-2007 Jeep Commander SUVs and 2005-2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs. Consumers lodged 32 complaints, alleging that if the driver's knee or leg accidentally hits the ignition key fob, the engine could shut off. 



This affects power steering and brakes, and it may cause the airbags to fail. A second investigation involves a larger number of vehicles. Around 700,000 vehicles are affected, including the 2008-2010 Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Grand Caravan, and Dodge Journey as well as the 2009-2010 Dodge Journey AWD. In rough road conditions, the key can rotate from the run position to the ACC position, and airbags may not deploy in a front crash. 

Although Chrysler had already issued a recall for ignition key problems, only 2010 models were covered. Twenty-three consumers are still complaining, and many say that they experienced the defect condition after the recall remedy was applied. One crash was reported in relation to the first investigation, but there are no known injuries or deaths in either case.

Thursday, 5 June 2014

BREAKING NEWS - Statement from GM CEO Mary Barra.

Thank you and welcome to our Global Town Hall meeting. I have a lot to cover today, so let’s get started.
On Monday, former U.S. Attorney Anton Valukas presented the findings of his investigation into our ignition switch recall to the Board of Directors. As promised, we have shared the report with the appropriate government officials. This morning, I want to discuss it with you. I also want to update you on the company’s commitment to create a compensation program for victims.
Before addressing the Valukas report, I first want to take this opportunity to again express my deepest sympathies to the families that lost loved ones and to those who were injured.

I realize there are no words of mine that can ease their grief and pain. But as I lead GM through this crisis, I want everyone to know that I am guided by two clear principles: First, that we do the right thing for those who were harmed; and, second, that we accept responsibility for our mistakes and commit to doing everything within our power to prevent this problem from ever happening again.
With respect to the Valukas report, you should know that he and his team had complete independence in their activities. The investigation covered more than 350 interviews with over 230 individuals and more than 41 million documents. 
Mr. Valukas has confirmed that he and his investigators were provided with unlimited access to interview any GM employee and every request for an interview of a GM employee was granted. A number of former GM employees and third parties were also interviewed as part of the investigation.
I will share my perspective and announce some actions in response to the report.  My understanding is NHTSA, our regulator, will post the full report on their website, which is available for anyone to review.
I can tell you the report is extremely thorough, brutally tough and deeply troubling. For those of us who have dedicated our lives to this company, it is enormously painful to have our shortcomings laid out so vividly. I was deeply saddened and disturbed as I read the report.
But this isn't about our feelings or our egos. This is about our responsibility to act with integrity, honor and a commitment to excellence.
With all of our colleagues around the world watching today, I want it known that this recall issue isn't merely an engineering or manufacturing or legal problem, it represents a fundamental failure to meet the basic needs of these customers.
Our job is clear: To build high quality, safe vehicles. In this case with these vehicles, we didn't do our job. We failed these customers. We must face up to it and learn from it. To that end, on behalf of GM, we pledge that we will use the findings and recommendations from this report as a template for strengthening our company.
What the Valukas investigation uncovered – in this situation – is a pattern of incompetence and neglect.

Repeatedly, individuals failed to disclose critical pieces of information that could have fundamentally changed the lives of those impacted by a faulty ignition switch. If this information had been disclosed, I believe in my heart the company would have dealt with this matter appropriately.
Furthermore, numerous individuals did not accept any responsibility to drive our organization to understand what was truly happening. The report highlights a company that operated in silos, with a number of individuals seemingly looking for reasons not to act, instead of finding ways to protect our customers.
Let me be clear:  This should never have happened. It is unacceptable. Our customers have to know they can count on our cars, our trucks and our word. Because of the actions of a few people, and the willingness of others in the company to condone bureaucratic processes that avoided accountability, we let these customers down.
To give you a sense of the thoroughness and forcefulness of the investigation, I want to paraphrase a few of the key conclusions:
  • GM personnel's inability to address the ignition switch problem, which persisted for more than 11 years, represents a history of failures.
  • While everybody who was engaged on the ignition switch issue had the responsibility to fix it, nobody took responsibility.
  • Throughout the entire 11-year history, there was no demonstrated sense of urgency, right to the very end.
  • The ignition switch issue was touched by numerous parties at GM – engineers, investigators, lawyers – but nobody raised the problem to the highest levels of the company.
  • Overall, the report concludes that from start to finish the Cobalt saga was riddled with failures, which led to tragic results for many.
I hate sharing this with you as much as you hate hearing it.  But I want you to hear it.  In fact, I never want you to forget it. This is not just another business crisis for GM. We aren't simply going to fix this and move on. We are going to fix the failures in our system – that I promise.  In fact, many are already fixed.  And we are going to do the right thing for the affected parties.
But I never want to put this behind us. I want to keep this painful experience permanently in our collective memories. I don't want to forget what happened because I – and I know you -- never want this to happen again.
You should know that Mr. Valukas’ report revealed no conspiracy by the corporation to cover up the facts. In addition, the investigators found no evidence that any employee made a trade-off between safety and cost.
The problem is this case is more complicated and more nuanced. What Valukas found was a pattern of management deficiencies and misjudgments – often based on incomplete data – that were passed off at the time as business as usual.
Unfortunately, the report found, these seemingly benign actions led to devastating consequences. In short, we misdiagnosed the problem from the beginning.
Experienced engineers, with responsibility for safety, didn’t understand that the airbags would not deploy if the ignition switch changed position.
I know many of you are saying to yourselves that this problem isn't a fair reflection of the company as a whole.  I know it's not. We are better than this. But we own this problem, and we have to have the courage to deal with it in the right way.
As we have learned more about this situation over the last few months, we have acted aggressively to uncover the facts, correct the problems and restructure the internal systems that allowed this problem to develop in the first place.  I mentioned earlier that we are posting a summary of all our actions on the website, but I want to highlight five of the most critical steps we have undertaken:
1)   We named Jeff Boyer Vice President of Safety for the company, elevating and integrating our safety processes under a single leader.  Jeff reports directly to Mark Reuss, and Jeff and I meet regularly.
2)   We added 35 safety investigators that will allow us to identify and address issues much more quickly.  And we have already seen the positive results of their work.
3)   We instituted our Speak Up for Safety program encouraging employees to report potential safety issues quickly.  And we are going to recognize them for doing so.
4)   We announced the creation of, and have implemented, a new Global Product Integrity organization that will enhance our overall safety and quality performance.
5)   Finally – and this is an incredibly important one – we restructured the safety decision-making process to raise it to the highest levels of the company.  Senior management is now going to be at the center of these issues.
The Valukas report makes a series of recommendations in eight major areas.  I am committing the company to act on all of these recommendations.  In each of the major areas, we have already taken action.  There is much more to do, of course.  But we are going to move forcefully to complete the recommendations on an expedited timetable.
Evidence of our work is already apparent.  As I’m sure you know, we are taking an aggressive approach on recalls.  And we are bringing greater rigor and discipline to our analysis and decision-making process regarding recalls and other potential safety-related matters.  This is the new norm.
We are redoubling our efforts and believe they will be substantially completed by the end of the second quarter.  In the near term, you might expect to see a few more recall announcements.
We have also made a number of personnel decisions. Some of these are tough calls, as you can well appreciate, and we held off making moves until this investigation was complete. But with the facts before us, we felt it was important to make a number of changes, and we have already done so.
Fifteen individuals, who we determined to have acted inappropriately, are no longer with the company.  Some were removed because of what we consider misconduct or incompetence. Others have been relieved because they simply didn't do enough: They didn’t take responsibility; didn’t act with any sense of urgency.
Disciplinary actions have been taken against five additional people as well.  With these moves, I feel we have addressed the personnel issues in this matter.
Consistent with our priority to do the right thing for those that were harmed, we will be implementing a compensation program for those who have lost loved ones or who have suffered serious physical injuries as a result of an ignition switch failure. 
To that end, we engaged noted expert Ken Feinberg to review options and ultimately to administer the compensation program.
Again, with all the changes we have implemented and are now undertaking, the job of correcting our mistakes is only beginning. Strengthening our systems and adding resources are critically important steps in improving our company.  But as positive as these steps are, they still aren’t enough.  To excel – to truly build the best auto company for customers – we have to change our behavior as well.
We have to personalize this challenge.  Quality and safety aren’t someone else’s responsibilities.  They are mine. They are yours. We all must feel a personal responsibility to see that this company excels at every level.
Together, we have to understand that the attitudes and practices that allowed this failure to occur will not be tolerated. Also, if we think that cleaning up this problem and making a few process changes will be enough, we are badly mistaken.
Our job is not just to fix the problem. Our job must be to set a new industry standard for safety, quality and excellence. To settle for anything less would be a profound error.
So if you are aware of a potential problem affecting safety or quality and you don't speak up, you are a part of the problem. And that is not acceptable. If you see a problem that you don't believe is being handled properly, bring it to the attention of your supervisor. If you still don't believe it's being handled properly, contact me directly.
I want an environment at GM where the customer is at the center of every action and every decision.  After all, we exist to serve their needs, not the other way around. We jointly own our successes and our failures. We have to hold each other accountable.
Every day, 220,000 GM employees get up and go to work with a sincere commitment to do their best.  You and I both know that the vast majority of our colleagues care deeply about safety and quality and have the highest integrity.
The simple truth is each one of us has the power to make GM a better, more customer-focused company. It's time we unleash the full power of this great company.
When I started at GM, I certainly never expected to be CEO. And I certainly didn't expect to be in a situation like this. But I'm here and you are here, and we have to be committed to lead in a way that brings honor and respect to this company.
Even on a day as tough as this I am proud and honored to work for General Motors.  I know we have a dedicated and talented team of loyal, honest employees. 
I know, because of your efforts, our current vehicles are winning in the marketplace on safety, quality and design. I know our dealers are proud to sell our vehicles, and they care deeply about providing excellent service to our customers.  I know our suppliers work hard to provide the best components for our vehicles. And, most important of all, I know, as you do, that our products enhance the lives of millions of people all over the world every day.
As I prepared for today, I thought long and hard about the very tough message I would be delivering.  I knew full well how difficult this experience would be for all of us.  But I also knew the only course was to be direct and totally honest.
This is a test of our character and our values.  In the end, I’m not afraid of the truth, and I know you aren’t either.  I want it known that we will face up to our mistakes and take them head on. 
The fact is I believe in this company and I believe in you.  I want GM to be the world’s best automotive company – for customers.  Whatever it takes to do that is what we are going to do.
Thank you.

GM expected to dismiss multiple employees as internal probe is released

General Motors plans to announce that it is dismissing multiple employees, including engineers, members of its legal staff and at least one vice president, in connection with their roles in a deadly recall that was delayed for years after ignition switches were known to be faulty, a person familiar with the company's plans said today.
Those being let go are expected to include Ray DeGiorgio, the engineer who was in charge of the ignition switch and violated GM protocol by keeping the same part number in 2006 when he approved modifications that fixed the defect without informing regulators or the public, the person said.
At least two published reports today also said GM is planning the terminations. A GM spokesman declined comment.

GM also plans to terminate Gary Altman, the former program engineering manager of the Chevrolet Cobalt who, along with DeGiorgio, has been suspended with pay since April 10, said another the person familiar with GM's plans.
Neither DeGiorgio nor Altman have commented publicly on their situations.
GM CEO Mary Barra has scheduled a town hall meeting with employees at 9 a.m. to share findings from an internal investigation into why GM waited so long to recall 2.6 million Cobalts, Saturn Ions and other cars whose airbags could fail in a crash if the ignition slips out of “run” mode. She will address reporters and Wall Street analysts during subsequent events.
The investigation was conducted by former U.S. Attorney Anton Valukas, who also issued the official report on the collapse of the Lehman Brothers investment bank. GM’s general counsel, Mike Millikin, who helped lead the investigation, is expected to be absolved of wrongdoing and stay with the automaker but other members of the legal department are among “a number of people” being fired,The Wall Street Journal reported, citing unidentified sources.

The report will show that there was no conspiracy to cover up the matter and that Barra, everyone who reports directly to Barra, GM’s board and former CEO Dan Akerson all had no knowledge of the defect before December, the Journal said. The issue first reached the top GM committee that voted on whether to issue recalls in mid-December, about a week after Barra was selected to succeed Akerson.
New board committee
GM’s board is expected to form an operational risk-management committee to better monitor potential risks, the newspaper said. It said the report concludes that GM managers did not connect problems with the switches to the potential for fatal crashes.
GM says it has linked 13 deaths and 47 crashes to the defective switches. Lawyers and safety advocates contend that the death and injury toll is far higher.
At least one vice president and a senior lawyer will be among those leaving GM, The Detroit Newsreported. The newspaper described the report as “painful,” according to people who have seen it, and said GM would turn it over early today to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which would in turn make it public later in the day.
GM in May admitted breaking federal law and agreed to pay a $35 million fine levied by NHTSA. It also has to meet with NHTSA officials monthly to discuss potential safety issues and implementation of the changes recommended by Valukas’ report.
Bob Lutz, the former GM vice chairman who headed product development, said last night during a dinner event at Eastern Michigan University that high turnover and lack of communication in the company caused the faulty ignition switches to go unnoticed.
Lutz said each department in the company knew small aspects of the problem, but employees never came together to look at the big picture.